Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/1215
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHaffejee, Firozaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSommerville, Thomas E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-11T09:44:43Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-11T09:44:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014-06-09-
dc.identifier.citationHaffajee, F. and Sommerville, T.E. 2014. Fairness in using negative marking for assessing true/false questions. The Independant Journal of Teaching and Learning. 9 : 75-82.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1818-9687-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/1215-
dc.description.abstractMultiple choice questions are a popular method of testing as they are easy to mark. However, they also lend themselves to guessing. True/False questions are particularly prone to guessing. This can be alleviated by deduction of marks for incorrect answers. The University of KwaZulu-Natal currently uses true/false questions in its assessments, which are answered by means of pencil-and-paper sheets that are optically scanned, marks being calculated according to a standard formula. A trial of a proposed new computer program revealed mark discrepancies compared to the current scheme. This study evaluates the program’s marking scheme ‘internal negative marking’ – whereby an overall negative mark for an item consisting of a stem and several true/false questions is ‘rounded up’ to zero. We enumerate the cause of the discrepancies, demonstrate that the latter scheme diminishes the penalty for guessing and may encourage strategic students to leave out parts of the curriculum when studying.12en_US
dc.format.extent8 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherThe Independant Institute of Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe journal of independent teaching and learningen_US
dc.subjectMultiple choice questionsen_US
dc.subjectTrue-False questionsen_US
dc.subjectNegative markingen_US
dc.titleFairness in using negative marking for assessing true/false questionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.urihttp://www.academia.edu/9139559/Higher_Education_Studies_as_a_field_of_researchen_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-004387en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Academic Support)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Firoza_2014_Fairness in using_TIJTL.pdf85.5 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

1,097
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 50

886
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.