Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10321/1289
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Stephen | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Naidoo, Kovin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Harris, Geoffrey Thomas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bilotto, Luigi | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ferrão, Jorge | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Loughman, James | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-25T06:00:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-06-25T06:00:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Thompson, S.; Naidoo, K.; Harris, G.; Bilotto, L.; Ferrao, J.and Loughman, J. 2014. The development of a public optometry system in Mozambique: a Cost Benefit Analysis. BMC Health Services Research. 14:422 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-6963 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1289 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The economic burden of uncorrected refractive error (URE) is thought to be high in Mozambique, largely as a consequence of the lack of resources and systems to tackle this largely avoidable problem. The Mozambique Eyecare Project (MEP) has established the first optometry training and human resource deployment initiative to address the burden of URE in Lusophone Africa. The nature of the MEP programme provides the opportunity to determine, using Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), whether investing in the establishment and delivery of a comprehensive system for optometry human resource development and public sector deployment is economically justifiable for Lusophone Africa. Methods: A CBA methodology was applied across the period 2009–2049. Costs associated with establishing and operating a school of optometry, and a programme to address uncorrected refractive error, were included. Benefits were calculated using a human capital approach to valuing sight. Disability weightings from the Global Burden of Disease study were applied. Costs were subtracted from benefits to provide the net societal benefit, which was discounted to provide the net present value using a 3% discount rate. Results: Using the most recently published disability weightings, the potential exists, through the correction of URE in 24.3 million potentially economically productive persons, to achieve a net present value societal benefit of up to $1.1 billion by 2049, at a Benefit-Cost ratio of 14:1. When CBA assumptions are varied as part of the sensitivity analysis, the results suggest the societal benefit could lie in the range of $649 million to $9.6 billion by 2049. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a programme designed to address the burden of refractive error in Mozambique is economically justifiable in terms of the increased productivity that would result due to its implementation. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 8 p | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC health services research (Online) | en_US |
dc.subject | Optometry | en_US |
dc.subject | Cost benefit analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Health economics | en_US |
dc.subject | Mozambique | en_US |
dc.subject | Uncorrected refractive error | en_US |
dc.subject | Eye health | en_US |
dc.subject | Human resource developemnt | en_US |
dc.subject | Blindness | en_US |
dc.subject | Visual impairment | en_US |
dc.subject | Higher education | en_US |
dc.title | The development of a public optometry system in Mozambique: a cost benefit analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.publisher.uri | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/422 | en_US |
dc.dut-rims.pubnum | DUT-004386 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-422 | - |
local.sdg | SDG08 | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Article | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
Appears in Collections: | Research Publications (Management Sciences) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1472-6963-14-422.pdf | 354.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s)
619
checked on Dec 13, 2024
Download(s)
389
checked on Dec 13, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.