Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2029
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWhite, Horace Lindsay-
dc.contributor.authorTerry, Lynette Vanessaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T06:47:56Z
dc.date.available2017-01-31T06:47:56Z
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.otherDIT98550-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2029-
dc.descriptionA dissertation presented in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban Institute of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2002.en_US
dc.description.abstractWaddell (2000) describes low back pain as a 20th century medical disaster as, despite the efforts, skills and resources available today, the management of simple backache has not reduced the rate of chronic back pain and disability. Foster (1989: 9) indicates that as many as 60-80% of the general population experience LBP during adult life, with between 12-35% suffering from it at anyone time. Waddell (2000: 301) states that while 90% of acute or recurrent attacks settle within 6 weeks, 60% of people have at least one re-occurrence within the next year. Swenson (1998: 108) estimates that mechanical disorders of the spine represent at least 98% of LBP cause. Waddell (2000: 305) believes the aim of primary management is to provide symptomatic control of pain and prevention of disability. A large number of therapeutic options may be considered to provide symptomatic relief however, there is no good, scientific evidence that these options produce lasting benefits or that they change the natural history of back pain. He believes that symptomatic measures are only valuable if they facilitate active exercise and rehabilitation. Waddell (2000: 303) states that there is considerable evidence that manipulation can provide short-term symptomatic benefit in patients with acute back pain without nerve root pain of less than 1 month's duration. Manipulation may be equally effective in dealing with recurrent attacks, however there is limited evidence for the effectiveness of manipulation in patients with chronic LBP and nerve root pain. With the rising popularity of magnetic field diagnostic techniques such as MR! (magnetic resonance imaging), magnets and electrical devices are beginning to gain mainstream medical.en_US
dc.format.extent167 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshChiropracticen_US
dc.subject.lcshBackacheen_US
dc.subject.lcshSpinal adjustmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshMagnetotherapyen_US
dc.titleThe efficacy of static magnetic therapy as an adjunct to chiropractic manipulation for the treatment of mechanical low back painen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2029-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Terry_2002.pdf8.23 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

370
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Download(s)

283
checked on Dec 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.