Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2129
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPenter, C. S.-
dc.contributor.authorMathews, Roberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T06:49:08Z
dc.date.available2017-01-31T06:49:08Z
dc.date.issued1995-
dc.identifier.otherDIT14562-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/2129-
dc.descriptionDissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Masters Diploma in Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, Durban, South Africa, 1995.en_US
dc.description.abstractVariations in prescribed treatment frequencies have resulted from an absence of tested theory. In response to this, the objecti ve of this study was to compare the efficacy of once and three times weekly treatment frequencies in the management of mechanical low back pain. It was hypothesised that both treatment protocols would be effecti ve, but the three times weekly protocol was expected to be more effective. This randomised clinical trial consisted of experimental and descriptive survey design. Thirty voluntary subjects diagnosed as having facet syndrome, sacroiliac syndrome or a combination of these two were divided into two groups of fifteen and randomly allocated to each study group. Chiropractic treatment was administered, according to the allocated frequency, for a maximum of three weeks. The outcome measures included the response of patients to the NRS-lOl pain intensity scale, the Oswestry Back Disability Index, positive orthopaedic test scores and lumbar spine ranges of motion. Data was collected from these measurement criteria before the onset of treatment, at the end of the last treatment session, and at a follow up consultation one month after the last treatment.en_US
dc.format.extent156 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshBackacheen_US
dc.subject.lcshChiropraticen_US
dc.titleThe approaches of frequent and infrequent application of chiropractic treatment : a study of their relative efficacy in the management of mechanical low back painen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2129-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Mathews_1995.pdf3.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

401
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

197
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.