Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4478
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZondo, Robert Walter Dumisanien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-04T11:40:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-04T11:40:07Z-
dc.date.issued2018-04-10-
dc.identifier.citationZondo, R.W.D. 2018. Assessing the financial implications of quality management system accreditation on small training providers in KwaZulu-Natal. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences. 21(1). doi:10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1728en_US
dc.identifier.issn1015-8812 (Print)-
dc.identifier.issn2222-3436 (Online)-
dc.identifier.otherisidoc: GD9UP-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4478-
dc.description.abstractBackground: A quality management system (QMS) in education and training is designed in accordance with industry quality models of ISO 9001. Its techniques ensure quality in skills development. However, training providers incur significant costs to obtain QMS accreditation. Therefore, the discourse on the economic effect of QMS accreditation in small training providers is crucial. Aim: This paper investigates the influence of QMS accreditation on the financial performance of small training providers in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). Setting: The South African Qualification Authority (SAQA) is a statutory body, regulated in terms of the National Qualification Framework (NQF) Act No. 67 of 2008 to oversee the development and implementation of the NQF. They are responsible for accrediting 21 sector-based Education and Training Quality Authorities (ETQAs) for the purpose of monitoring and auditing training achievements in terms of the national standards and qualifications. Methods: For this study to achieve its objectives, the ETQAs belonging to 12 different Sector Education and Training Authorities (SETAs) provided the sample frame of accredited training providers in KZN. The SETAs are responsible for administering education and training within their industrial sectors. Of the 89 small training providers, 81 participated in the study. Descriptive and correlation analysis were used to test the two objectives. That is, to examine whether the management and marketing practices of QMS accredited small training providers improve their financial performance. Results: The study indicates that there is no statistical significant relationship between the management and marketing practices of QMS accredited small training providers and their financial performances. This shows that small training providers do not incorporate financial measures during QMS implementation. The accounting departments are not covered in the QMS strategy. Conclusion: Small training providers should take advantage of QMS accreditation for their business’s financial performance. They should incorporate financial indicators during QMS implementation and measure QMS’s economic effects on an ongoing basis. The original value of this paper is in its approach in uncovering the strengths and weaknesses of QMS accreditation in the financial performances of accredited small training providers in KZN.</jats:p>en_US
dc.format.extent8 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSouth African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences; Vol. 21, Issue 1en_US
dc.subject14 Economicsen_US
dc.subjectQuality management system (QMS)en_US
dc.subjectSmall training providersen_US
dc.titleAssessing the financial implications of quality management system accreditation on small training providers in KwaZulu-Natalen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2022-10-28T13:05:51Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1728-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ZondoRWD_2018.pdfArticle912.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
SAJEMS Copyright Clearance.docxCopyright Clearance212.58 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

244
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

76
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.