Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4499
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBond, Virginiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNgwenya, Fredricken_US
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Emmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorNgwenya, Nothandoen_US
dc.contributor.authorViljoen, Larioen_US
dc.contributor.authorGumede, Dumileen_US
dc.contributor.authorBwalya, Chitien_US
dc.contributor.authorMantantana, Jabulileen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoddinott, Graemeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDodd, Peter J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAyles, Helenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSimwinga, Musondaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWallman, Sandraen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeeley, Janeten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T07:53:51Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T07:53:51Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-
dc.identifier.citationBond, V. et al. 2019. Value and limitations of broad brush surveys used in community-randomized trials in Southern Africa. Qualitative health research. 29(5): 700-718. doi:10.1177/1049732318809940en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-7323-
dc.identifier.issn1552-7557 (Online)-
dc.identifier.otherpubmed: 30556470-
dc.identifier.otherpmc: PMC6533803-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4499-
dc.description.abstractWe describe and reflect on a rapid qualitative survey approach called "Broad Brush Survey" (BBS) used in six community-randomized trials (CRTs)/studies in Zambia and South Africa (2004-2018) to document, compare, classify, and communicate community features systematically for public health and multidisciplinary research ends. BBS is based on a set sequence of participatory qualitative methods and fieldwork carried out prior to a CRT intervention and/or research by social scientists to generate rapid community profiles using four key indicators: physical features, social organization, networks, and community narratives. Profiling makes apparent similarities and differences, enabling comparison across communities and can be facilitated by an ideal model of open-closed systems. Findings have provided practical outputs (e.g., community profiles) and academic opportunities (e.g., community typologies). The BBS approach enables complex social landscapes to be incorporated in CRTs. This method has proven to be useful, adaptable and to have multidisciplinary appeal.en_US
dc.format.extent19 pen_US
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofQualitative health research; Vol. 29, Issue 5en_US
dc.subjectBBSen_US
dc.subjectBroad Brush Surveyen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectZambiaen_US
dc.subjectCommunity-randomized trialsen_US
dc.subjectQualitativeen_US
dc.subject11 Medical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subject16 Studies in Human Societyen_US
dc.subject17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshSocial Sciences-
dc.subject.meshPublic Health-
dc.subject.meshQualitative Research-
dc.subject.meshResearch Design-
dc.subject.meshAfrica, Southern-
dc.subject.meshSouth Africa-
dc.subject.meshZambia-
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.meshCommunity-Based Participatory Research-
dc.subject.meshAfrica, Southern-
dc.subject.meshCommunity-Based Participatory Research-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshPublic Health-
dc.subject.meshQualitative Research-
dc.subject.meshRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic-
dc.subject.meshResearch Design-
dc.subject.meshSocial Sciences-
dc.subject.meshSouth Africa-
dc.subject.meshZambia-
dc.titleValue and limitations of broad brush surveys used in community-randomized trials in Southern Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2022-10-26T13:57:38Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049732318809940-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
QHR Copyright clearance.docxCopyright clearance181.11 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Bond et al 2019.pdfArticle701.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

255
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

47
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.