Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/496
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPratt, Deirdre Denise-
dc.contributor.authorGutteridge, Robert Geoffreyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-04T07:22:15Z
dc.date.available2011-03-31T22:20:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.other325552-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/496-
dc.descriptionDissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree in Master of Technology: Education, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2009.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated key factors impacting on blended learning delivery with particular focus on socio-cultural and human-computer-interface issues, in the hope that the outcome of this enquiry might contribute positively towards the empowerment of learners and facilitators alike. The study involved a group of first year students enrolled in a Communications Skills Course offered by the (then) Department of English and Communication at the Durban University of Technology. The PRINTS Project, a webquest around which the course activities were based, provided an example of a blended delivery course in practice. While the teaching paradigm used in the course was constructivist, the research orientation employed in this project was critical realist. Critical realism focuses on transformation through praxis and also lends itself to modelling, which provides a way to understand the factors at play within a social system. In the preliminary stages of the research, an exploratory empirical (i.e. applied) model of blended learning delivery was formulated from a theoretical model of course delivery in order to assess which factors in blended learning were systemic and which were variables. The investigation then sought to uncover key factors impacting on the blended delivery system, utilising both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The findings were analysed in terms of the empirical model to gain an understanding of any factors that might be seen to either enhance or inhibit learning in blended delivery mode. The result was that certain core issues in blended learning and teaching could be clarified, including the use, advantages and disadvantages of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in a learning environment. The notion of the digital divide could also be reconceptualised, and the relationship between literacy (be it academic, professional or social), power and culture could be further elucidated, drawing specific attention to the South African educational environment. The notion of iv culture and its relevance in a blended delivery environment was also further clarified, since the findings of this research project suggested how and why certain key socio-cultural factors might impact, as both enhancers and inhibitors, on the blended learning delivery system.en_US
dc.format.extent143 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectBlended learning--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectInternet in higher education--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectWeb-based instruction--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectComputer-assisted instruction--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectMulticultural education--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectCommunication--Study and teaching--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectCritical realismen_US
dc.titleThe impact of socio-cultural factors on blended learning in the development of academic literacy in a tertiary vocational contexten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-000360en_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/496-
local.sdgSDG05-
local.sdgSDG04-
local.sdgSDG17-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Gutteridge_2009.pdf3.47 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 5

2,875
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 20

1,691
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.