Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/755
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSingh, Penny-
dc.contributor.authorDe Jager, Maria Louisa Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-03T09:33:03Z
dc.date.available2014-02-11T12:32:57Z-
dc.date.issued2012-09-03-
dc.identifier.other423278-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/755-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfilment of the requirement of the Degree of Magister of Technology: Language Practice, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2012.en_US
dc.description.abstractOutcomes-based education compelled South African teachers to make an important paradigm shift in education from a teacher-centred approach to a learner-centred approach. This paradigm shift in teaching and learning emphasised an active participation of learners which necessitated Technology Education (TE) teachers to restructure their teaching strategies in terms of the National Curriculum Statement (NCS). Conducted within a constructivist paradigm, this study was based on Shulman‟s (1986, 2004) theory of pedagogical and content knowledge, and Vygotsky‟s (1978) zone of proximal development within social constructivism. Using a mixed method approach, this study investigated teachers‟ understanding and implementation of the design process as it relates to teaching TE in the intermediate and senior phases (Grades 4–9) of the General Education and Training Band in KwaZulu-Natal. The study also considered the training of TE teachers in a bid to facilitate teaching and learning in the classroom and to enable learners to become creative and critical problem solvers. Analysis of the questionnaire and semi-structured responses revealed that teachers were interpreting and implementing policy differently and that they were not adequately trained to teach TE. As a result, classroom practice in terms of teaching and learners‟ experience of the design process in TE also differed. Valuable lessons were learned in this study for the structuring of training programmes for teachers in Technology Education to enhance teaching and learning in the classroom. Therefore, based on the findings, this study makes recommendations regarding teaching, learning, assessment, and training of teachers in TE.en_US
dc.format.extent211 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshTechnology--Study and teaching--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshCurriculum change--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshCompetency-based education--South Africaen_US
dc.titleTeachers' understanding and implementation of the design process as it relates to teaching Technology Education in the intermediate and senior phases (Grades 4-9) in the General Education and Training Band in KwaZulu-Natalen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-002252en_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/755-
local.sdgSDG04-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
DeJager_2012.pdf4.38 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

1,481
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 10

3,530
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.