Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/1842
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPenter, C. S.-
dc.contributor.authorAllwood, Tracey Elaineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T06:45:49Z
dc.date.available2017-01-31T06:45:49Z
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.otherDIT93220-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/1842-
dc.descriptionDissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, Durban, South Africa, 2001.en_US
dc.description.abstractNeck pain is a common condition that has become a serious health concern. Since there is controversy regarding the most effective management of this condition, further research needs to be executed. The purpose of this investigation was to compare manipulation combined with a cervical pillow to manipulation alone in the management of mechanical neck pain. The rationale behind this, was that manipulation is one of the most common treatments for spinal conditions and has shown significant results in alleviating mechanical neck pain. Cervical pillows have been investigated by various researchers. They have concluded that cervical pillows are effective in treating mechanical neck pain. Thus, using the pillow as an adjunct to manipulation should attain superior results to manipulation alone. This study consisted of 40 patients who were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. The average age of the patients was 34 years old and the average duration of neck pain was pain of greater than 6 months. The patients received 6 treatments over a 4 week period. Group1 were manipulated and given a cervical pillow to sleep on, while group 2 received manipulation alone.en_US
dc.format.extent109 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshChiropracticen_US
dc.subject.lcshNeck pain--Chiropractic treatmenten_US
dc.titleThe effectiveness of manipulation combined with a cervical pillow compared to manipulation alone in the management of mechanical neck painen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/1842-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Allwood_2001.pdf4.42 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

302
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

205
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.