Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10321/2562
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Govender, Jeevarathnam Parthasarathy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ndadziyira, Tafadzwa | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-20T08:34:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-20T08:34:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.other | 683446 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2562 | - |
dc.description | Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Management Sciences: Marketing, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2017. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | It is widely evident that the mobile phone industry is facing rapid growth, with the increased introduction of cheaper mobile phones in South Africa intensifying competition between such companies. A number of studies have been conducted in other countries on brand preferences, but there remains a gap in knowledge with regard to the South African market. It was therefore warranted to academically research factors influencing consumer brand preferences when purchasing mobile phones, in order to understand these preferences, and what consumers consider when making such purchases. The rationale of the study was to provide new insights for local marketers into the factors consumers consider most when looking at mobile phone brands. The aim of this study was therefore to determine brand preferences for mobile phones amongst students at a selected higher educational institution in South Africa. The study adopted a quantitative research approach, where the data obtained was descriptive and cross-sectional in nature. The research population was made up of students studying at the Durban University of Technology (DUT), where convenience sampling was performed on a target population of 378 students. The sample size was selected by giving questionnaires to those students most available to the researcher. The results were then analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 24.0 software. Validity was ensured by conducting a pre-test of the questionnaire, and the study’s reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Co-efficient Alpha test. The study findings showed that brand popularity, prices, product attributes, social influences and marketing communications all affect mobile phone brand preferences amongst students. The study results also showed, however, that there were some product attributes and social influences that did not influence these preferences. Recommendations are given to industry players to increase their knowledge of these important factors, to aid with the improvement of their brands and increasing their market preference in this highly competitive industry. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 141 p | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cell phones--South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Consumers' preferences--South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cell phones--Purchasing--South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Cell phone advertising--South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | College students--South Africa | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | College students--South Africa--Attitudes | en_US |
dc.title | Brand preference for mobile phones among students at a selected higher education institution | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.level | M | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.51415/10321/2562 | - |
local.sdg | SDG17 | - |
local.sdg | SDG03 | - |
local.sdg | SDG04 | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.openairetype | Thesis | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | restricted | - |
Appears in Collections: | Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NDADZIYIRA_T_2017.pdf | 1.54 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
3,016
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Download(s) 5
11,460
checked on Dec 22, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.