Factors influencing radiographer’s decision making in relation to postgraduate education

Abstract

Background The research and knowledge produced by postgraduate (PG) alumni is vital in improving the knowledge base of relevant fields. Postgraduate education is essential for an individual’s academic growth and a nation’s economic growth and development. South Africa is lagging behind with regard to PG outputs in various disciplines and radiography is one of them. Radiography is a relatively young academic profession in South Africa. Therefore, PG qualifications are critical to the development of the profession of radiography, both academically and clinically, to strengthen the academic force. The loss of academics, due to retirement and other reasons, necessitates the development of new academic professionals to replenish this expertise. Aim of the study The aim of the study was to explore the factors influencing radiographers’ decision making with regard to postgraduate (PG) education using Cross’s Chain-ofResponse (COR) Model as the theoretical framework to improve the enrolment and quality of PG education. Methodology The study employed an exploratory qualitative research method, using semistructured one-on-one interviews. The interview questions were based on Cross’s Chain-of-Response (COR) Model. The study was carried out at three provincial hospitals in the eThekwini district of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) as well as three private facilities within the district. The sample consisted of 20 qualified radiographers within these institutions. This research utilized an exploratory design and interpretivist paradigm. Thematic analysis of the collected data was performed with the use of the Atlas.ti software and the implementation of the code, re-code strategy. Findings Seven major themes that emerged from the data analysis were: (a) self-perception (b) attitude towards education (c) goals and expectations (d) life transitions (e) opportunities and barriers (f) information and (g) participation. The emerged themes were aligned to Cross’s Chain-of-Response Model. Conclusion The study revealed that the practicing radiographers in KZN exhibit a high selfperception of their capability of successfully completing PG programmes in radiography. However, many of the participants demonstrate little or no interest in pursuing these programmes. Their attitude and decision making towards pursuing these programmes are negatively influenced by a multitude of factors such as the absence of incentives, lack of time and institutional grievances. Participants consider PG programmes in radiography to simply provide opportunities in the academic field to achieve personal growth and satisfaction. Incentives such as potential growth in their field, monetary gain and/or a subsidy would be the strongest motivating factors to positively influence radiographers’ decision-making towards PG education.