Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3981
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGovender, Kevin-
dc.contributor.advisorSobuwa, Simpiwe-
dc.contributor.authorChule, Ntuthuko Giften_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T08:36:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-20T08:36:55Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-30-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/3981-
dc.descriptionA dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Health Sciences in Emergency Medical Care in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technology, 2020.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Occupational injuries and diseases affect approximately 260 million people worldwide and kill nearly 2.3 million people per year. While paramedics and other healthcare workers (HCWs) are responsible for ensuring the health of others, their working environment is also considered to be one of the most hazardous environments. Purpose: To describe the prevalence and risk factors associated with occupational injuries, as well as perceptions of both the mitigation and prevention of occupational injuries among paramedics working for KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Emergency Medical Rescue Services (EMRS). Methodology: The study adopted a quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional approach. The study population comprised operational paramedics working for the KZN EMRS with a sample of 334 paramedics being drawn from a total of 2378 KZN EMRS paramedics. The study was conducted in five of the eleven districts in KZN. The data collection methods used included a closed ended questionnaire and a document review. The data which had been collected was analysed using Stata version 15. The Pearson chi-squared test was used to test for associations between any two categorical variables and, in instances, where Pearson chi-squared test was invalid Fisher’s exact test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Two of the five districts provided the required information for reviewing the records. A total of 36 injuries were reported in the two districts between 2011 and 2018. The reported injuries included injuries from motor vehicle accidents (61%), musculoskeletal injuries (16.7%), needle-stick injuries (13.9%), accidental surgical blade cuts (5.6%) and assault injuries (2.8%). A total of 152 survey questionnaires were completed and returned – a 45% response rate. The findings from the selfadministered questionnaire revealed 25 (16.5%) unreported injuries which included musculoskeletal injuries (48%, n = 12), needle-stick injuries (48%, n = 12), and one (1) (4%) assault-related injuries. A further 49 (32.2%) injuries which had resulted in medical attention being sought included musculoskeletal injuries (55.1%, n = 27), injuries due to motor vehicle accidents (44.9%, n = 22), needle-stick injuries (26.5%, n = 13) and assault-related injuries (8.2%, n = 4). Overall, 59 (38.8%) paramedics had experienced occupational injuries (both reported and unreported). The paramedics’ perceived risk factors for occupational injuries included high speed driving (87.5%, n = 133), violent members of society (87.5%, n = 133), heavy objects and patient lifting (86.2%, n = 131), physical exhaustion (78.3%, n = 119), hazardous material (77%, n = 117), and temperature extremes (73%, n = 111). In addition, the paramedics’ perceptions regarding occupational injury prevention revealed the following precautions, namely, avoiding high speed driving (79.6%, n = 121), specific positioning during equipment and patient lifting (63.8%, n = 97), avoiding chaotic scenes (61.8%, n = 94) and avoiding working longer hours (49.3%, n = 75). Conclusion: While it may be anticipated that information regarding occupational injuries suffered by paramedics would not be public knowledge, access to this information for purposes of research that aim to establish mitigation and prevention strategies, should be subjected to fewer challenges. From the data that was available, paramedics from KZN EMRS experienced multiple types of occupational injuries from a variety of injury sources. These injuries could be a result of both, the nature of the work and environment in which paramedics operate. However, further research is necessary to identify and validate these findings, as well as presented strategies required to minimise the rates of occupational injury among paramedics working for KZN EMRS.en_US
dc.format.extent148 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPrevalenceen_US
dc.subjectRisk factorsen_US
dc.subjectOccupational injuriesen_US
dc.subjectEmergency care providersen_US
dc.subject.lcshEmergency medical services--Accidentsen_US
dc.subject.lcshIndustrial accidentsen_US
dc.subject.lcshEmergency medical technicians--Wounds and injuriesen_US
dc.subject.lcshAllied health personnel--Wounds and injuriesen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and risk factors of occupational injuries among emergency care providersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3981-
local.sdgSDG03-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Chule_NG_2020.pdfThesis3.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

260
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

668
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.