Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4057
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSibiya, Nokuthula M.-
dc.contributor.advisorNkosi, B. P.-
dc.contributor.authorShelembe, Thobile Namsile Vinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-10T06:58:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-10T06:58:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-01-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4057-
dc.descriptionThesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Philosophiae Doctor in Health Sciences in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technology, 2021.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground The South African Department of Education promulgated the Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) as a transformation strategy. However, a gap has been identified between the promise, the rhetoric of RPL and reality. An inconsistency in RPL assessments is also a problem as programmes are assessed differently. Aim The aim of this study was to explore and review the extent of RPL in the Faculty of Health Sciences and ultimately, develop a practice framework to enhance the RPL implementation. Methodology This study employed a multistage mixed method approach, using a case study framework. The first stage utilized the collection of qualitative data through semistructured interviews. The second stage utilized quantitative data collection through candidate’s portfolios of evidence, checking availability of documents required as evidence of prior experiential learning and competencies. The third stage also utilized the collection of quantitative data through reviewing the selection criteria, learner profiling and approval process, using the flow chart for RPL application and approval process. At each stage, the researcher drew upon strengths in the data collected which provided innovative approaches for addressing contemporary issues and ultimately achieving the goal of developing a theoretical model to enhance RPL implementation in the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technology. Findings The findings in this study revealed that RPL selection criteria in the Faculty of Health Sciences were in place. However, the findings further revealed that only one department had adequate profiling, support and mentor of candidates before development of portfolios of evidence. In all other departments, there was no evidence of learner profiling. Conclusion The Faculty of Health Sciences needs to put strategies in place to enhance the implementation of RPL. Several factors that influenced the implementation of RPL were identified, thus highlighting the need to develop a tailored practice framework for the Faculty of Health Sciences at DUT. The findings of the study, in relation to its objectives, highlight the focus areas for developing a tailored practice framework.en_US
dc.format.extent266 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Excellence in Teaching and Learningen_US
dc.subjectDurban University of Technologyen_US
dc.subjectLifelong learningen_US
dc.subjectFaculty of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectRecognition of Prior Learning and Profilingen_US
dc.subject.lcshMedical sciences--Study and teaching (Continuing education)en_US
dc.subject.lcshRecognition of prior learningen_US
dc.subject.lcshMedical personnel--Study and teaching (Continuing education)en_US
dc.subject.lcshDurban University of Technology--Facultyen_US
dc.titleA practice framework to enhance the implementation of Recognition of Prior Learning : a case study of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the Durban University of Technologyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelDen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4057-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Health Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Shelembe_TNV_2021.pdfThesis3.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

120
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

235
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.