Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4498
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGumede, Dumileen_US
dc.contributor.authorNgwenya, Nothando B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNamukwaya, Stellaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBernays, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeeley, Janeten_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T07:46:25Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-07T07:46:25Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-08-
dc.identifier.citationGumede, D., Ngwenya, N.B., Namukwaya, S., Bernays, S. and Seeley, J. 2019. A reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa. BMC medical ethics. 20(1): 47-. doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-6939 (Online)-
dc.identifier.otherpubmed: 31286952-
dc.identifier.otherpmc: PMC6615300-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4498-
dc.description.abstractThis article discusses our reflections on ethical and methodological challenges when conducting separate interviews with individuals in dyads in the uMkhanyakude district, South Africa. Our work is embedded in an ethnographic study exploring care relationships between adolescents and their older carers in the context of a large-donor funded HIV programme. We use these reflections to discuss some of the challenges and present possible management strategies that may be adopted in conducting dyadic health research in resource-poor settings.<h4>Methods</h4>Drawing from the relational agency, three rounds of separate interviews and participant observation were undertaken with dyads of adolescents aged between 13 and 19 and their older carers aged 50+ from October 2017 to September 2018. A reflexive journal was kept to record the interviewer's experiences of the whole research process. We identified methodological and ethical challenges from these data during the thematic analysis.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 36 separate interviews were conducted with six pairs of adolescent-older carer dyads (n = 12 participants). Five themes emerged: recruitment of dyads, consenting dyads, confidentiality, conducting separate interviews with adolescents and older carers, and interviewer-dyad interaction. We also illustrated how we dealt with these challenges.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Results from this study can guide the recruitment, consenting and collecting data for health studies that employ a similar form of enquiry in LMICs. However, ethical and methodological challenges should be recognised as features of the relationships between cross-generation dyads rather than weaknesses of the method.en_US
dc.format.extent12 pen_US
dc.format.mediumElectronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMC medical ethics; Vol. 20, Issue 1en_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.subjectConfidentialityen_US
dc.subjectDyadsen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectOlder carersen_US
dc.subjectSeparate interviewsen_US
dc.subject2201 Applied Ethicsen_US
dc.subjectApplied Ethicsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshHIV Infections-
dc.subject.meshParents-
dc.subject.meshConfidentiality-
dc.subject.meshPatient Selection-
dc.subject.meshInformed Consent-
dc.subject.meshEthics, Research-
dc.subject.meshAdolescent-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshRural Population-
dc.subject.meshSouth Africa-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshInterviews as Topic-
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult-
dc.subject.meshAdolescent-
dc.subject.meshConfidentiality-
dc.subject.meshEthics, Research-
dc.subject.meshFemale-
dc.subject.meshHIV Infections-
dc.subject.meshHumans-
dc.subject.meshInformed Consent-
dc.subject.meshInterviews as Topic-
dc.subject.meshMale-
dc.subject.meshMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.meshParents-
dc.subject.meshPatient Selection-
dc.subject.meshRural Population-
dc.subject.meshSouth Africa-
dc.subject.meshYoung Adult-
dc.titleA reflection on ethical and methodological challenges of using separate interviews with adolescent-older carer dyads in rural South Africa.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2022-10-26T14:01:59Z-
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-6-19-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12910-019-0383-9-
local.sdgSDG03-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Gumede et al 2019.pdfPublished version654.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BMC ME Copyright Clearance.docxCopyright Clearance199.81 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

222
checked on Sep 15, 2024

Download(s)

38
checked on Sep 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.