Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4646
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFomunyam, Kehdinga Georgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhoza, Simon Bhekien_US
dc.contributor.editorFomunyam, Kehdinga-
dc.contributor.editorSimon, Bheki-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-15T09:55:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-15T09:55:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-14-
dc.identifier.citationFomunyam, K.G. and Khoza, S.B. 2020. Theorising open curriculum charges as pathway to responsiveness in South African higher education. In: Curriculum theory, curriculum theorising, and the theoriser. Leiden: Brill Sense. pp: 53-69. doi:10.1163/9789004447943_004en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789004447936-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4646-
dc.description.abstractCurriculum discourse in South African higher education has always involved debates around responsiveness and how best to make the curriculum respond to local needs. This was amongst the reasons for the call to decolonise the curriculum. With encounters in education being a function of the curriculum at play, it follows that the curriculum shapes the educational experience, and how prepared students are for the job market, be it to create employment or to seek such. With the rate of unemployment in South Africa increasing, the nation needs graduates who are job creators, not jobseekers. The open curriculum offers an excellent pathway for educational encounters which are not only responsive, but uniquely career-oriented. This chapter adopts Aoki’s conceptualisation of the curriculum as lived experience, making three fundamental arguments. First, the chapter argues that there is a need for the deconstruction of academic curriculum standardisation. Second, the chapter argues for an itinerant curriculum; and lastly, the chapter argues for curriculum encounters propelled by responsive curriculum matters in the South African higher education. The chapter concludes that career pathways have been hindered by poor curriculum choices. Such has been engendered by curriculum standardisation and hegemonic curriculum practices adopting a one-size-fits-all approach. For a higher-education curriculum to be responsive, students, as co-constructors or creators of knowledge, need to be part of the process, driving the change they want to see in their future.en_US
dc.format.extent17 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBRILLen_US
dc.subjectOpen curriculumen_US
dc.subjectResponsivenessen_US
dc.subjectHigher educationen_US
dc.subjectStudentsen_US
dc.subjectExperienceen_US
dc.titleTheorising open curriculum charges as pathway to responsiveness in South African higher educationen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
dc.date.updated2023-02-02T11:39:49Z-
dc.publisher.urihttps://brill.com/view/book/9789004447943/BP000011.xmlen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1163/9789004447943_004-
local.sdgSDG08-
local.sdgSDG04-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeBook chapter-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Academic Support)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
9789004447943_Chapter03.pdfPublished version739.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Kehdinga_Khoza_2021_Chapter03.pdfChapter739.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

245
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Download(s)

206
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.