Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/465
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDe Beer, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Johan Andries Christoffelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T08:38:27Z
dc.date.available2009-09-14T08:38:27Z
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.other323463-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/465-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfillment of the requirements for a Master's Degree in Technology: Business Administration, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2008.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this research is to compare the firearm legislation between South Africa and selected countries and to determine if multiple firearm owners and firearm dealers are affected in terms of economics, and changes to their business environment by the new Firearms Act, 60 of 2000.The sub-objectives of this study are as follows: - To compare firearm regulations between countries that were affected by access to firearms and deaths as a result thereof; - To evaluate the economic effect of the legislation on a firearm dealer/dedicated hunter/dedicated sportsman/collector of firearms; - To evaluate the economic effect of the restrictions on the number of firearms an owner may legally possess; - To evaluate the economic impact of the cost involved for re-licensing a firearm; - To establish how the firearm business environment is affected according to the political, economic, social, technological and ecological influences on business strategies. The research does not include firearm owners with hand weapons or individuals with fewer than four firearms. It also excludes South African Police Service and South African Defence Force weapons, as these are not usually provided to the public. The aim of this research is to establish if there is an effect on the dealers and hunters in the firearm industry in South Africa with the advent of the Firearms Control Act 60 of 2000. The world trend changed firearm legislation world-wide and South Africa followed. In the following chapter the global and South African issue is discussed with some of the arguments on why the firearm legislation had to change.en_US
dc.format.extent128 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectFirearms--Law and legislation--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectIllegal arms transfers--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectWeapons--South Africaen_US
dc.titleFirearms in South Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.dut-rims.pubnumDUT-000344en_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/465-
local.sdgSDG03-
local.sdgSDG08-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Pretorius_2008.pdf779.56 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

1,291
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 20

2,208
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.