Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4869
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHansmann, Robynne-
dc.contributor.advisorMusvoto, Godfrey-
dc.contributor.authorNgubane, Sibongiseni Memoryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T08:38:15Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T08:38:15Z-
dc.date.issued2023-05-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4869-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Degree of Masters of the Built Environment in Urban and Regional Planning, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2023.en_US
dc.description.abstractCommunities located in the Durban Back of Port area experience the compounded burden of environmental degradation with the legacy of untransformed Apartheid neighbourhoods. Despite the documented concerns and priority to deal with the cumulative environmental impacts on the communities of South Durban within planning policy documents, the participation process is unclear. Poorly defined participation processes not only inhibit the substantial issues being raised but fail to inform processes to address the concerns raised. These weakly defined civic engagements were found in the study to reflect some of the implementation challenges in the field of urban planning. The primary aim of the research study is to critically analyse participation processes for development as outlined in planning policy documents to make proposals within the context of the Durban Back of Port case study from sampled stakeholder categories; corporate community, civil society, and government. The Durban Back of Port case study is a geographical area under the authority of eThekwini Municipality in KwaZulu Natal. This precinct represents a situation where communities live near one of Sub-Saharan Africa’s busiest industrial areas, and at the backside area of one of the most active ports in Africa. This research study found the precinct residents to have been subjected to both environmental racism, and post-Apartheid environmental injustice. The study area presents contrasting land uses, where negative externalities of industrial development impact on the adjacent residential uses. In effect, the legacy of Apartheid spatial planning is layered with environmental racism and has evolved into environmental injustice in present time. This is a qualitative research study that applies hybrid analytical tools; document analysis, policy analysis and thematic analysis to critically analysis participation processes within the case study. This research study established three type categories of stakeholders representing varying interest; economic, social, and environmental. The purposely sampled categories comprised of corporate community, civil society, and the spheres of government, these are organisations that are either located or have jurisdictional authority in the Durban Back of Port. It uses the theoretical lenses of Environmental Justice, Advocacy Planning, Communicative Rationality and Action, Collaborative Planning, Participatory Planning, and Arnstein’s Ladder of Participation to better understand participation processes.en_US
dc.format.extent158 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.lcshLand use--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshLand use--Planningen_US
dc.subject.lcshIndustrializationen_US
dc.subject.lcshEnvironmental justiceen_US
dc.subject.lcshHarbors--Access roadsen_US
dc.titleA critical analysis of participation using the planning context of the Durban Back of Port Precincten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/4869-
local.sdgSDG09-
local.sdgSDG10-
local.sdgSDG15-
local.sdgSDG16-
local.sdgSDG11-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Engineering and Built Environment)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Ngubane_SM_2023.pdf4.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

246
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

413
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.