Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/4989
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMakwambeni, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMakwambeni, Blessingen_US
dc.contributor.authorUsadolo, Samen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T08:04:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-19T08:04:32Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationMakwambeni, P., Makwambeni, B. and Usadolo, S. 2023. An analysis of stakeholder engagement in the e-learning policy-making process at a higher education institution in South Africa. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies. 5(1): 1-13. doi:10.51415/ajims.v5i1.1167en_US
dc.identifier.issn2663-4597-
dc.identifier.issn2663-4589 (Online)-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/4989-
dc.description.abstractOver the past two decades, Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in South Africa have been formulating e-learning policies to assist them to realise the full potential of using ICTs in teaching and learning. E-learning policies serve as guiding frameworks that create enabling environments for embedding ICTs in teaching and learning. The development of e-learning policies has attracted various stakeholders and actors with varied interests, views, priorities, influence and power. Consequently, stakeholder engagement is now an essential factor in the policy process. The efficacy of an e-learning policy can therefore be judged based on the multiple perspectives that it includes and the inclusion of those it affects in the policy-making process. In light of this background, this paper examined stakeholder engagement that characterised the e-learning policy formulation process at a University of Technology in South Africa (UoT). How stakeholders were engaged in the policy-making process using stakeholder engagement as its analytical framework, the stakeholders and actors involved in the policy formulation process and the nature of the dialogue that informed the policy formulation process were examined. The qualitative study gathered evidence using semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The study's findings show that the policy-making process at the UoT followed a bureaucratic process dominated by one actor, the policy delegate. Key stakeholders were excluded during the policy formulation process and were only consulted at the drafting stage. As a result, stakeholder engagement in the policy formulation process was low, resulting in key stakeholders and actors lacking policy ownership. Our findings also show that the exclusion of key stakeholders in the policy formulation process resulted in a policy that exclusively focuses on the Learner Management System and overlooks other technologies that play a crucial role in teaching and learning. These findings suggest the need to include all critical stakeholders and actors affected and interested in the e-learning policy at every stage of the policy formulation process.</jats:p>en_US
dc.format.extent13 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDurban University of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAfrican Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies; Vol. 5, Issue 1en_US
dc.subjectE-learningen_US
dc.subjectPolicy-makingen_US
dc.subjectStakeholder engagementen_US
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_US
dc.subjecte-Learning policyen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of stakeholder engagement in the e-learning policy-making process at a higher education institution in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.date.updated2023-09-14T13:07:58Z-
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-9-5-
dc.identifier.doi10.51415/ajims.v5i1.1167-
local.sdgSDG12-
local.sdgSDG04-
local.sdgSDG17-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
AJIMS Copyright Clearance.docxCopyright clearance215.85 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open
Makwambeni_Usadolo_2023.pdfArticle527.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

223
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s)

99
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.