Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/5506
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMsuya, Norah Hashim-
dc.contributor.advisorWomack, Anna Johanna Cathari-
dc.contributor.authorZulu, Lungelo Percivalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-17T16:27:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-17T16:27:36Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10321/5506-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Management Sciences, specialising in Business Law at the Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2024.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe South African government enacted the National Credit Act No. 34 of 2005 (NCA) primarily to increase consumer access to credit markets, protect consumers from unfair credit and credit-marketing practices by credit providers, promote a fair, accessible marketplace, and establish national norms and standards relating to consumer protection, as well as reduce consumer over-indebtedness. Consequently, credit providers are obligated to adhere to strict rules and regulations when determining a credit consumer's affordability prior to granting home loans. Given the importance of the NCA and the absence of support consumers received from the previous Usury Act No. 73 of 1968 and the Credit Agreements Act No. 75 of 1980, this research seeks to investigate unfair debt practices, challenges and risks experienced by borrowers in connection with unpaid debts, and the role and strategies of the NCA in addressing such challenges and risks. The study employed a quantitative research method. Respondents (credit consumers) completed a survey questionnaire (hardcopy or online) by indicating their credit perspective in terms of unfair credit practices encountered within the market; challenges when trying to access credit; risks in connection with unpaid debts; and the strategies of the NCA to prevent such challenges and risks; along with awareness of the Act. The data strongly suggested borrowers encountered multiple challenges and risks, as a direct result of unfair credit practices by providers. An overall analysis revealed borrowers are unclear regarding the NCA and its provisions. However, findings revealed the NCA does play a significant role in regulating the South African credit market. Prior to enactment of the Act, only a percentage of low- and middle-income groups had access to credit; to ensure equal access, a formal, accessible credit market had to be established.en_US
dc.format.extent143 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectNational Credit Act No. 34 of 2005 (NCA)en_US
dc.subjectCrediten_US
dc.subjectLoansen_US
dc.subject.lcshConsumer credit--South Africa--Durbanen_US
dc.subject.lcshSouth Africa. National Credit Act, 2005en_US
dc.subject.lcshConsumer protection--South Africa--Durbanen_US
dc.subject.lcshLoans--South Africa--Durbanen_US
dc.titleUnfair credit practices, borrower challenges and risks, and the role of the National Credit Act in the eThekwini Metropolitan Areaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/5506-
local.sdgSDG09en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairetypeThesis-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Zulu_LP_2024.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

139
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Download(s)

111
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.