Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/78
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Reneeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-18T13:44:44Z
dc.date.available2007-10-18T13:44:44Z
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.other306844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/78-
dc.descriptionThesis (Masters in Business Administration)-Business Studies Unit, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2006en_US
dc.description.abstractProject Management is the wave of the future. This discipline and its evolution continues to be one of the principal means by which operational and strategic changes are managed in the enterprise. The importance of Project Management for organisational success will expand, rather than wane, in years to come. Projects, particularly large scale complex ones with multiple stakeholders, are failing at alarming rates despite a wide spectrum of efforts to solve the problem. The lack of meaningful results and outcomes is due, in part, to the fact that organizations tend to operate on a set of unproven assumptions concerning project objectives, business requirements, user expectations, motivations, agendas, schedules, costs and time frames. The management dilemma is that Transnet has committed R 65 billion to projects in the hope of developing its core businesses to that of world-class standards as a logistics service provider in South Africa. Transnet’s capital project division, Protekon, is responsible for managing the projects committed to this R 65bn capital expenditure. Transnet’s perception of Protekon’s failure to successfully deliver projects could result in appointments of external consultancies such as Hatch McDougal and Guba (HMG – an engineering consultant firm). Whereas, previously, Protekon was the monopoly service provider of engineering and project management skills within Transnet, Transnet’s sub-divisions appear to be utilizing outside consultancies more frequently. The reason for procuring engineering and consultancy services external to Transnet, among others, is the perception that Protekon is performing poorly in delivering successful projects. The outsourcing of work, fuelled by the negative perception of Protekon’s performance, directly impacts on the profitability of Protekon in the short to medium term. The objective of this dissertation was firstly to investigate the effect of Protekon’s involvement in Transnet’s project success; and secondly, to recommend strategies to improve the rate of project success, that could be applied within Transnet and Protekon.en_US
dc.format.extent138 pen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectSuccess in business--South Africaen_US
dc.subjectRisk management--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshProject management--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshStrategic planning--South Africaen_US
dc.subject.lcshManagement--Dissertations, Academicen_US
dc.titleAn investigation into the criteria for project success within Transneten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/78-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Pillay_2006.pdf1.18 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 5

2,159
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Download(s) 5

8,581
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.