Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10321/1161
Title: | Institutionalising a value enacted dominant organisational culture: An impetus for whistleblowing | Authors: | Dorasamy, Nirmala Pillay, Soma |
Keywords: | Whistle blowing;Retaliation;Values;Organizational culture | Issue Date: | 2011 | Publisher: | Virtus Interpress | Source: | Dorasaym, N and Pillay, S. 2011. Institutionalising a value enacted dominant organisational culture: An impetus for whistleblowing. Corporate Ownership and Control. 8(3). 297-304. | Journal: | Corporate ownership & control (Online) | Abstract: | Whistle blowing on organizational wrongdoing is becoming increasingly prevalent. However, the renewal of existing literature reveals that every potential whistle blower is not always inclined to blow the whistle, despite protection being accorded to whistleblowers through legislation. The cost of blowing the whistle can be a deterrent to potential whistle blowers. zit is quite plausible that an organisational culture which institutionalizes a dominant value based system can decrease whistle blowers expectations of retaliation. The purpose of this article is to provide conceptual framework for a dominant value enacted organisational culture which can serve as an impetus for whistle blowing in the public sector. It is important that organizations make their value systems "lived" practices to motivate potential whistleblowers to report on wrongdoing. It can be argued that the institutionalisation of enacted values can lead to low perceptions of retaliation, which is often a deterrent in blowing the whistle. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1161 | ISSN: | 1810-0368 1810-3057 |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv8i3c2p6 |
Appears in Collections: | Research Publications (Management Sciences) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
DUT-001273 PDF (Published version).pdf | 1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
955
checked on Dec 16, 2024
Download(s) 50
648
checked on Dec 16, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Altmetric
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.