Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3465
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorZulu, Sylvia Phiwani-
dc.contributor.advisorEyono Obono, Seraphin Desire-
dc.contributor.authorAdedokun, Theophilus Adedayoen_US
dc.contributor.editorZulu, Sylvia Phiwani-
dc.contributor.editorEyono Obono, Seraphin Desire-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T08:09:49Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-10-
dc.identifier.citationAdedokun, T.A. 2020. Surveying KwaZulu-Natal Universities’ Language Academics for the Modelling of Factors Affecting their Attitudes towards Computer Assisted Language Learning Tools for African Indigenous Languages.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/3465-
dc.descriptionSubmitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Language Practice, Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2020.en_US
dc.description.abstractComputer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) has been proven by literature to be of immense benefit to the teaching and learning of language at all levels of education. However, it is interesting that university language academics seem to have a negative attitude towards CALL. The aim of this study, therefore, is to design a conceptually sound model of the factors that affect the attitudes of language academics towards Computer Assisted Language Learning Tool for African Indigenous Languages (CALLTAIL) and to examine the relationship between CALL and language attrition, especially for marginalised African languages. Supporting this study are these four theories, namely, the Theory of Reasoned Action, the Theory of Planned Behaviour, Hume’s Theory of Beliefs, and the Digital Divide Theory. The study uses content analysis review of suitable literature and a survey of fifty (50) language academics from three (3) public universities in the province of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa. The factors identified to affect the attitudes of language academics are their computer experience, their subjective norms, and their perceived usefulness of CALLTAIL. The findings of this study indicate that subjective norms and perceived usefulness of CALLTAIL are the two factors that affect other variables in this study. The findings also indicate that all the variables in this study are interlinked and interrelated. The study recommends the optimization of language academics’ computer experience, subjective norms, and perceived usefulness of CALLTAIL. The chief contribution of this study is to have investigated the use and adoption of Computer Assisted Language Learning Tools in the context of African indigenous languages and this can be considered as a new research in comparison to the reviewed studies of this research. Keywords: instructors, teachers, academics, attitude, Computer Assisted Language Learningen_US
dc.format.extent150 pen_US
dc.format.mediumArts and Design-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectInstructorsen_US
dc.subjectTeachersen_US
dc.subjectAcademicsen_US
dc.subjectAttitudeen_US
dc.subjectComputer-assisted language learningen_US
dc.subject.lcshAfrican languages.en_US
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higher--Effect of technological innovations on--South Africa.en_US
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Higher--South Africa--Computer-assisted instruction.en_US
dc.subject.lcshComputers and college students--South Africa--Attitudes.en_US
dc.titleSurveying KwaZulu-Natal universities’ language academics for the modelling of factors affecting their attitudes towards computer assisted language learning tools for African indigenous languagesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.date.updated2020-08-05T01:55:50Z-
dc.description.levelMen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.51415/10321/3465-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeThesis-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Theses and dissertations (Arts and Design)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
FULL DISSERTATION_Final 2020.pdfPublished version1.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

838
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Download(s)

337
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.