Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10321/3550
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Carolen_US
dc.contributor.authorDe Beer, Marieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMason, Roger B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-25T10:40:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-25T10:40:11Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationSmith, C. De Beer, M., Mason, R.B. 2015. Tacit knowledge sharing behavior, within a relational social capital framework, in a South African University of Technology. Journal of Applied Business Research. Vol. 31(6): 1089-1104en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-7626 (print)-
dc.identifier.issn2157-8834 (online)-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10321/3550-
dc.description.abstractThe sharing of tacit knowledge is an important influence on the development of intellectual capital in a University of Technology but whereas its effects are clear in a business context, they have been absent from studies in the context of higher education. This study integrated relational social capital and reasoned action theory to construct a model to investigate the factors that predict an individual’s intention to share tacit knowledge. Specifically, it examined the relationship between relational social capital in terms of trust (affect and cognitive-based trust), shared norms and values (including social norms and norms of social support and reciprocity) and the individual’s attitude towards sharing tacit knowledge. It further examined the relationship between the individual’s attitude, their perceived norms and perceived behavioral control over the sharing of tacit knowledge and their intention to share tacit knowledge. A hypothesized, theoretical model of the individual’s intention to share tacit knowledge was developed. This model was found to be a poor fit to the data and an alternative model was developed which was found to be a good fit to the data. This study incorporated nine research interviews and five hundred and fifty four questionnaires. Relational social capital was found to be significant for predicting individuals’ intentions to share tacit knowledge but the reasoned action variables were found to be less significant, particularly perceived behavioral control over the sharing of tacit knowledge, indicating the need for further research.en_US
dc.format.extent16 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherClute Instituteen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Business Researchen_US
dc.subjectRelational social capitalen_US
dc.subjectSocial capitalen_US
dc.subjectTheory of reasoned actionen_US
dc.subjectTacit knowledge sharingen_US
dc.subjectTrusten_US
dc.subjectNormsen_US
dc.subjectAttitudeen_US
dc.titleTacit knowledge sharing behavior, within a relational social capital framework, in a South African university of technologyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i6.9469-
local.sdgSDG01-
local.sdgSDG10-
local.sdgSDG04-
local.sdgSDG17-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
Appears in Collections:Research Publications (Management Sciences)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Smith_ JABR_Vol31#6_Pg1089-1104_ 2015.pdf357.09 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

469
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Download(s)

98
checked on Dec 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.